On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:11:19PM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
> It's easier and takes less ram than using tabbed+st+dvtm+abduco (or a
> grouping wm+st+dvtm+abduco)
Can you back this up with some actual numbers or is it just speculation
on your part?
The most memory demanding component in the above setup is probably
dvtm's scrollback buffer whose size you can control via the -h command
line option.
Marc
--
Marc André Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
Received on Thu Jul 03 2014 - 22:37:52 CEST