Re: [dev] [PATCH] Reorder-and-extend-glyph-attributes

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:24:44 +0200

On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:29:09 +0200
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:

> Well, I think is good idea have two flags instead of only one.
> If someone really needs two blink modes, he must be able to patch it
> easily, and do the or of both flags is not complex.

Please don't bring this argument here. You are talking about an
imaginary user who is keen on patching st for a faster blinking mode.

There is no such kind of user! Realize it! It's the wrong way to go
along in this discussion, because you are trying to leave the suckless
principles behind. I hope you see that and I'd be glad if we discussed
the feature itself instead of trying to discuss the design to allow
easily adding this feature.

> Of course, I always try to do it in this way ;).

I'm happy we agree on this part.

> This was my original feeling, you can read it in [1].
> [1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1406/22348.html

Well, then, what's the matter with you thinking about applying this
superfluous patch? ;)

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Thu Jul 31 2014 - 15:24:44 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jul 31 2014 - 15:24:10 CEST