Re: [dev] [utmp][PATCH] Use same die() call in parent and child
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> I am used to fallthrough (maybe because I didn't put mark ever),
> but maybe is not the same for all the programmers :?.
> This patch is more about style that real benefit of the changes. I
> usually reuse all the possible paths of a switch to avoid code duplication.
Heyho Roberto,
usually the compiler should fix this code duplication, at least with -Os set.
So, before the patch, the code is easier to read and the compiler takes care of
code deduplication. After the patch you save some compiler optimization time
versus a little longer parsing time due to a few more lines of code which are
also less intuitive. I think we're better off without this one.
--Markus
Received on Thu Aug 07 2014 - 18:13:17 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Aug 07 2014 - 18:12:12 CEST