Re: [dev] [st] will global-less changes be wanted upstream?

From: <>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 00:19:54 +0200

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 04:51:27PM -0500, Steven Degutis wrote:
> I'm making progress on my port of st to OS X, and one of the changes
> I'm making is to get rid of globals, turning most of them into fields
> on Term, and making all the functions that use them take Term* as an
> argument. It's a very minimal change, still very compatible with the
> original st. Are these changes going to be wanted upstream?

What is the point?

One obvious cons is that it will bloat the code, make it less readable.

-- q
Received on Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:19:54 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:24:06 CEST