Re: [dev] [st] will global-less changes be wanted upstream?

From: Dimitris Papastamos <>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 23:30:05 +0100

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 04:51:27PM -0500, Steven Degutis wrote:
> I'm making progress on my port of st to OS X, and one of the changes
> I'm making is to get rid of globals, turning most of them into fields
> on Term, and making all the functions that use them take Term* as an
> argument. It's a very minimal change, still very compatible with the
> original st. Are these changes going to be wanted upstream?

What were the changes that were specific to the port to OS X? This
particular change doesn't seem related to porting.
Received on Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:30:05 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Aug 17 2014 - 00:36:07 CEST