Re: [dev] [RFC] Design of a vim like text editor

From: M Farkas-Dyck <>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:07:51 -0500

On 15/09/2014, Maxime Coste <> wrote:
> And for C++, well, I know there is some vocal individuals against it on the
> sl mailing list, but I think most members are sensible, we do not need to
> stay frozen with C89, C++ is bigger than C, more complex, but provides a lot
> of abstraction features that makes it easier to reason and organize your
> program.

There some are vocal individuals against it elsewhere too [1][2]. They
are not frozen with C89. I am not frozen with C89. You seem to imply a
false dichotomy.

Received on Tue Sep 16 2014 - 04:07:51 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 16 2014 - 04:12:08 CEST