[dev] Questions about sta.li
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Henrique Lengler <
henriqueleng_AT_openmailbox.org
>
Date
: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 19:42:05 -0200
Hi,
I read in the suckless site and I'm interested about statically linked
executables and replace glibc.
My questions are:
- Why clibc? Most of distros that don't use glibc, use musl.
- Why mksh as shell?
-- Henrique Lengler
Received on
Thu Nov 06 2014 - 22:42:05 CET
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Sylvain BERTRAND: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Previous message
:
Bobby Powers: "Re: [dev] c++-style comments [was fsbm]"
Next in thread
:
Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] Questions about sta.li"
Reply
:
Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] Questions about sta.li"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Nov 06 2014 - 22:48:09 CET