Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7

From: Johan Guldmyr <johan.guldmyr_AT_csc.fi>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:07:36 +0200 (EET)

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Silvan Jegen" <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com>
> To: "dev mail list" <dev_AT_suckless.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 11:34:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7

> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Johan Guldmyr <johan.guldmyr_AT_csc.fi> wrote:
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" <czarkoff_AT_gmail.com>
>>> To: "dev mail list" <dev_AT_suckless.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 10:13:04 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7
>>
>>> Johan Guldmyr said:
>>>> Output: https://pastee.org/35jas
>>>
>>> You should try building it with "-g" in CFLAGS.
>>
>> CFLAGS = -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Os ${INCS} ${CPPFLAGS} -g
>>
>> Still can't unlock.
>
> The '-g' option adds debugging symbols to the binary. Please re-run
> gdb with the binary compiled including this option and post the
> results.

Only difference in "bt full" output is different numbers(memory address?):

-#0 0x00007fdbfb12ea30 in __poll_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
+#0 0x00007f40ad6c2a30 in __poll_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
Received on Fri Nov 07 2014 - 11:07:36 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Nov 07 2014 - 11:12:08 CET