Re: [dev] Object-Oriented C for interface safety?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: M Farkas-Dyck <strake888_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:13:01 -0500

On 27/11/2014, koneu <koneu93_AT_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Of course each "class" can only implement one interface.

Why? C lacking tuple types makes implementing more awkward but not impossible.
Received on Thu Nov 27 2014 - 16:13:01 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: M Farkas-Dyck: "[dev] K, a low-level procedural imperative programming language"
Previous message: koneu: "Re: [dev] Object-Oriented C for interface safety?"
In reply to: koneu: "Re: [dev] Object-Oriented C for interface safety?"
Next in thread: random832_AT_fastmail.us: "Re: [dev] Object-Oriented C for interface safety?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 27 2014 - 16:24:08 CET