Re: [dev] [website] [proposal] Add suckless logo and minor style change

From: Markus Teich <>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:07:47 +0100

Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well executing swerc for each request is still overhead. But for the sake of
> not doing weirdo stuff (like hiding .html or redirecting from previously known
> URL to some .html file) in order to keep all the links to intact,
> I'm not inclined to disable the swerc approach atm.

Heyho Anselm,

Most static site generators I've seen just use the approach, that every folder
has a index.html, so that dispalys the file. I'm not that much into web stuff to
know if that is called „.html hiding“ or what the disadvantages would be.
However I know that it would allow for keeping all current links intact.

Received on Tue Feb 03 2015 - 10:07:47 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Feb 03 2015 - 10:12:07 CET