Re: [dev] [sbase] [PATCH] ls fallback if ioctl does not work

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: <k0ga_AT_shike2.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:48:58 +0100

> On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:35:51 +0100
> k0ga_AT_shike2.com wrote:
>
>> I like your solution, but I think COLUMNS should have a bigger
>> priority, because in this case user can define a different value of
>> the current width.
>
> Okay, then do 3 fallbacks
>
> ioctl -> getenv -> fixed width
>

Ups, I didn't explain it correctly. My idea was

getenv -> ioctl -> fixed width
Received on Sun Feb 15 2015 - 19:48:58 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ralph Eastwood: "Re: [dev] Suckless web rendering engine"
Previous message: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [sbase] [PATCH] ls fallback if ioctl does not work"
In reply to: FRIGN: "Re: [dev] [sbase] [PATCH] ls fallback if ioctl does not work"
Next in thread: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] [sbase] [PATCH] ls fallback if ioctl does not work"
Reply: Dimitris Papastamos: "Re: [dev] [sbase] [PATCH] ls fallback if ioctl does not work"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Feb 15 2015 - 20:00:10 CET