Re: [dev] [sbase][patch] test: a little cleanup
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 05:28:02PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:10:09 +0100
> "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
>
> > NOTREACHED is the traditional comment and it is understood by dozen of
> > lint incarnations (although I guess gcc ignores it), so my vote is to
> > keep NOTREACHED.
I prefer NOTREACHED as well in the same spirit as FALLTHROUGH. This
is what the style guide suggests too. It is not really a big deal though.
Either way I'd like to minimize the instances where this is needed in the
first place.
Received on Sun Mar 08 2015 - 17:39:06 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Mar 08 2015 - 17:48:07 CET