On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 07:37:01PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the feeling we should typedef uint_least32_t Rune, as in libutf,
> so we don't have to have this long-winded and somewhat cryptic type
> everywhere.
>
> cls
>
No prob, here's the same patch, but using a `Rune' typedef.
Received on Tue May 05 2015 - 22:13:21 CEST