Re: [dev] [vis][RFC][PATCH 1/2] Replace first '/' of substitute command with \0

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Eric Pruitt <eric.pruitt_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 18:50:40 -0700

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:25:29PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Silvan Jegen <s.jegen_AT_gmail.com>

What's the point in signing off on patches where you're the sole author?
Seems like redundant clutter to me.

Eric
Received on Wed May 06 2015 - 03:50:40 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: suigin: "[dev] [ST] [PATCH] Clean up xdraws and optimize glyph drawing with non-unit kerning values"
Previous message: suigin: "Re: [dev] [ST] [PATCH] Changed type for UTF-32 codepoints from long to uint_least32_t"
In reply to: Silvan Jegen: "[dev] [vis][RFC][PATCH 1/2] Replace first '/' of substitute command with \0"
Next in thread: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev] [vis][RFC][PATCH 1/2] Replace first '/' of substitute command with \0"
Reply: Silvan Jegen: "Re: [dev] [vis][RFC][PATCH 1/2] Replace first '/' of substitute command with \0"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed May 06 2015 - 04:00:15 CEST