Re: [dev] surf release?

From: Connor Lane Smith <>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:49:40 +0100

On 1 June 2015 at 15:33, Martti K├╝hne <> wrote:
> However upstream is not everyone's taste either, in that configuration
> changes require recompiling of the respective binary.

I'm quite happy using the default configuration for most tools though,
as are a lot of people. And since it's the default it's a perfectly
reasonable candidate for packaging. The only changes I would expect in
Debian would be things like using "x-terminal-emulator" in place of
"st" in dwm/config.h.

Ultimately the problem being solved is that the code in git can be
fairly unstable, as they're being actively worked on. Releases are
intended to be stable snapshots of the code. Whether or not you then
proceed to package the release is neither here nor there really.

Received on Mon Jun 01 2015 - 16:49:40 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jun 01 2015 - 17:00:10 CEST