Re: [dev] [dwm] 6.1 release

From: Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:04:08 +0000

On 7 December 2015 at 15:51, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach_AT_mailplus.pl> wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
> POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be.

I do think it a little unfortunate that dwm release numbering means
essentially nothing. The jump from 6.0 to 6.1 was far greater than 5.9
to 6.0 was, which is surprising given that most software uses
major-minor versioning.

cls
Received on Mon Dec 07 2015 - 17:04:08 CET