Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: <e_AT_bestmx.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 09:45:25 +0100

> > in response to the request made by Evil_Bob on OFTC#suckless
> > i hereby supply the patch "sbase"
> > and the proposed version of "eprintf.c"
> > as i believe it should look like.
> >
> > http://file.bestmx.net/ee/suckless/
>

> Now, what you did here is rip out this status code handling

No, i didn't

> In sbase, we have this more or less "scheme" how function naming
> works.

how is it relevant to the topic?
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 09:45:25 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 21 2015 - 09:48:09 CET