On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:13:06 +0100
"e_AT_bestmx.net" <e_AT_bestmx.net> wrote:
Hey Eugene,
> so you insist, on your stupid strncmp()
> ok. good luck.
nah, just refactored the code. Refactoring means that you generally don't
change the behaviour. I think, before we can even start discussing this
properly, the codebase should be free of "bloat". :P
I also see no reason to add a specific usage-eprintf-function. What's
wrong with the strncmp()? Tell me please!
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:16:35 CET