Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:16:35 +0100

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:13:06 +0100
"e_AT_bestmx.net" <e_AT_bestmx.net> wrote:

Hey Eugene,

> so you insist, on your stupid strncmp()
> ok. good luck.

nah, just refactored the code. Refactoring means that you generally don't
change the behaviour. I think, before we can even start discussing this
properly, the codebase should be free of "bloat". :P

I also see no reason to add a specific usage-eprintf-function. What's
wrong with the strncmp()? Tell me please!

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:16:35 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:24:16 CET