Re: [dev] libutil/eprintf clarification patch (to the Evil_Bob's request)

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:53:39 +0100

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:49:58 +0100
Markus Teich <markus.teich_AT_stusta.mhn.de> wrote:

Hey Markus,

> what do you think about making `usage(int status, char *shortargs)` an
> eprintf-like function in eprintf.c? This might clear things up for everyone.

I had that floating in my mind as well, but the thing is, that some utils
call usage() pretty often.
You would have to specify the long usage-string every time which makes it
unfeasable.

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Mon Dec 21 2015 - 10:53:39 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 21 2015 - 11:00:30 CET