Re: [dev] [PATCH] [slock] React to key release rather than key press events

From: Brad Luther <bradkluther_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:42:37 -0200

Say somebody manages to "clamp" any letter or number key without you
noticing, and you for the better of it cannot type in your password
(not because it's all-caps, but because it's spamming lots of chars).

So we want the screen to turn red on key down? Any key? Why just shift?

Not that I care too much, but for the sake of consistency I put this out there.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:35 PM, FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 21:02:27 +1300
> David Phillips <dbphillipsnz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey David,
>
>> This patch does not change this. With this patch applied, for someone to
>> tamper with the shift key and *not* make a change on the screen, their only
>> option is to press and never release it. This is still quite suitable for the
>> paranoid.
>
> just keep it as is. Look at this example:
> Say somebody manages to "clamp" the shift key without me noticing, and I
> for the better of it cannot type in my password (because it's all-caps).
>
> So we want the screen to turn red on key down.
>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>
> --
> FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
>
Received on Thu Jan 28 2016 - 15:42:37 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jan 28 2016 - 15:48:14 CET