On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Alba Pompeo <albapompeo_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> What I mean is, wouldn't it be duplicated work to create your own awk
> when there's already a good version out there? Or is there something
> wrong with bwk's One True Awk?
>
That's more or less what Dimitris said. Why should suckless maintain a
copy of OTA, if OTA just can be built on the system where you want it?
How's duplicating one effort removing duplication in another?
cheers!
mar77i
Received on Sat Feb 20 2016 - 12:00:09 CET