Re: [dev] suckless shared tools

From: Louis Santillan <lpsantil_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 01:40:30 -0800

Got a link to google repo?

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 February 2016 at 02:03, Daniel Kowalski <kowal256_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Synchronization of common code between projects is built into git:
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule
>
> git submodules are an abomination. They touch git repos for no good
> reason. If someone really wants to manage a tree of git repos,
> something like Google's repo tool is more appropriate, despite its
> ugly dependency on XML config files.
>
>> Maybe libsl should be submodule of other projects that use it?
>
> No. Each project maintainer has to make sure that his version of libsl
> is updated from time to time. But we don't force projects to break if
> someone updates libsl.
>
> Nevertheless, libsl should be the master for any adoption occurrence.
>
> -Anselm
>
Received on Mon Feb 29 2016 - 10:40:30 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Feb 29 2016 - 10:48:11 CET