Re: [dev] Languages that suck (was "Note On Webkit Versions")

From: Sylvain BERTRAND <>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:57:39 +1100

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:29:11PM -0700, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
> Given this effort, and the fact that they've gotten pretty damn far
> towards being usable, I'd say you can't *possibly* argue that "they
> all *epic-ly* [sic] fail at the kernel step." (emphasis mine).

Like Hurd.

> Of course, you didn't mention rust in your initial list of "unperfect"
> languages....

rust is better than go, or the other way around?

Fight! (while I go code something in a subset of C).

Received on Tue May 03 2016 - 01:57:39 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 03 2016 - 02:00:17 CEST