Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: hiro <23hiro_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:38:33 +0200

bad idea, just like the existing bullshit for auth in slock.
Received on Mon May 16 2016 - 17:38:33 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Christoph Ebersbach: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
Previous message: Jan Christoph Ebersbach: "[dev] [slock] PAM support"
In reply to: Jan Christoph Ebersbach: "[dev] [slock] PAM support"
Next in thread: Jan Christoph Ebersbach: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
Reply: Jan Christoph Ebersbach: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 16 2016 - 17:48:10 CEST