Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Jan Christoph Ebersbach <
jceb_AT_e-jc.de
>
Date
: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:51:45 +0200
What auth system are you using if it's neither PAM nor shadow/passwd?
On Mon 16-05-2016 17:38 +0200, hiro wrote:
> bad idea, just like the existing bullshit for auth in slock.
>
application/pgp-signature attachment:
signature.asc
Received on
Mon May 16 2016 - 17:51:45 CEST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Eric Pruitt: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
Previous message
:
hiro: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
In reply to
:
hiro: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
Next in thread
:
Eric Pruitt: "Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon May 16 2016 - 18:00:13 CEST