Re: [dev] [slock] PAM support

From: Eric Pruitt <>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:47:38 -0700

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:07:54PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> I guess this issue can still happen. I didn't remove most of the getpw*
> code in order to keep the patch small. I'm using sssd and so the getpw
> calls still work. The only issue is that the password hash can't be
> retrieved. This problem I solved with this patch by passing everything
> through PAM.

On the system I'm using that relies on PAM, my account doesn't have an
entry in the local /etc/passwd file. Disabling getpw and related bits
makes the patch work for me.

Received on Mon May 16 2016 - 20:47:38 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 16 2016 - 21:00:06 CEST