Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:45:41 +0200

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:07:03 -0800
Britton Kerin <> wrote:

Hey Britton,

> While I agree it's annoying to have the patches fail, I'm still happy
> I was able to find dwmfifo, it's quite useful to me and the patches aren't
> so rotten that they're hard to figure out. So maybe just fix the misleading
> file names? Also might be nice if the dates in the names corresponded
> to an actual date of a commit (I guess at the moment they correspond to
> the nearest earlier commit but I haven't checked).

we also had this discussion already. The point here is: using the date of
the "update" is the best and easiest heuristic. you see with one look
if a git-patch is relatively old or new.



Received on Wed Jun 15 2016 - 19:45:41 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jun 15 2016 - 19:48:11 CEST