On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:24:00AM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, David Phillips <dbphillipsnz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Some people thought it was a good idea to use 6.1 to denote git head before
> > 6.1 actually came out. This worked fine until they stopped maintaining
> > their patches to apply against git head.
> >
> > Something should be done about the patches that no longer apply cleanly,
> > however.
>
> Keep the "supported" patches as commits on separate branches in the
> official git repo?
>
> - Pretty obvious which commit is the patch derived from, +1
> - Quite easy to rebase a patch to latest master, +1
> - Are git branches considered suckless though? :)
>
> K.
>
What? Since when were any patches "supported"?
Received on Thu Jun 16 2016 - 01:10:56 CEST