Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?

From: Kamil Cholewiński <harry666t_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:24:00 +0200

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, David Phillips <dbphillipsnz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> Some people thought it was a good idea to use 6.1 to denote git head before
> 6.1 actually came out. This worked fine until they stopped maintaining
> their patches to apply against git head.
>
> Something should be done about the patches that no longer apply cleanly,
> however.

Keep the "supported" patches as commits on separate branches in the
official git repo?

- Pretty obvious which commit is the patch derived from, +1
- Quite easy to rebase a patch to latest master, +1
- Are git branches considered suckless though? :)

K.
Received on Wed Jun 15 2016 - 10:24:00 CEST