Re: [dev] JWM on website

From: Timothy Rice <t.rice_AT_ms.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 08:42:50 +1000

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:30:17AM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> MIght you have a well-balanced discussion, not over-too-serious or the
> other side? simply just in the middle, balanced.

A nice sentiment, but indeed for it to be a discussion it should be
two-sided. At the moment you are not listening to what anyone is telling
you. When someone says something, either agree or disagree (with reasons);
going off on some new tangent without acknowledging what other people have
said is to show you don't care about the discussion.

If you want it to be light-hearted, make a joke. If you want it to be a
discussion, make sure you engage with people on your discussion points.

~ Tim
Received on Wed Aug 03 2016 - 00:42:50 CEST