Re: [dev] JWM on website

From: <hadrien.lacour_AT_openmailbox.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 00:48:05 +0200

I'd say cwm instead of evilwm. When I had to use an ant screen laptop, it was pretty nice. The only thing I lacked is workspaces.

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:25:56AM +1000, Timothy Rice wrote:
> Hi Pat,
>
> > http://incise.org/not-so-tiny-window-managers.html
>
> On that list I see evilwm. Apparently it is stacking, and if I'm not
> mistaken it appears to have a similar size to dwm (maybe even smaller).
>
> So why propose JWM instead of EvilWM?
>
>
> ~ Tim
>
Received on Wed Aug 03 2016 - 00:48:05 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Aug 03 2016 - 00:48:17 CEST