Re: [dev] [sbase] about audit

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:50:40 +0200

On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:46:36 -0300
Marc Collin <> wrote:

Hey Marc,

> The missing brackets on paste.c that I talked about on the last
> message revealed something else to me.
> It was introduced in commit cdbc0d50356a0f7e0dd5755e3c46593a947cf029
> by FRIGN, 2015-01-29.
> Then it was marked as audited and correct in commit
> 1bc002b44acdbfec8d374bfd0e5a858a142c0378 also by FRIGN, 2015-03-17.
> This makes me think that a file should not be audited by a person that
> had many contributions to it. Because if the person missed something
> at first, it's likely she will miss something again. Someone else that
> thinks in different ways is more likely to find errors.
> So I think files should be audited by third-parties or at least by
> more than 1 person before being marked as audited. This way there are
> less chances of passing a files as audited when there are still
> errors.
> Just to make it clear, I'm not criticizing FRIGN. This happens to
> everyone. It's *much* harder to find your own bugs, but easier to find
> other's bugs. That's what I think.

yeah sorry for introducing this. Mistakes happen. Overall, the audits
fixed many many bugs though, so it's pain that can be taken.
Send a patch to fix it and everything is cool. :)



Received on Thu Sep 01 2016 - 16:50:40 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Sep 01 2016 - 17:00:12 CEST