On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:14:25 +0100, Cág wrote:
>[0]: http://repo.or.cz/fbpdf.git
Thanks, it seems acceptable. Even if it'd be better if mupdf could do djvu
(but I'm daydreaming here).
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:46:58PM +0300, ilabdsf_AT_gmail.com wrote:
> Why would you want to do this? It makes some sense to save new scans to
> DjVu because the format is simplier, but converting one lossy format to
> another lossy format is not a good idea.
>
Well, because of the massive compression improvements, and because I prefer
free stuff.
Received on Tue Sep 13 2016 - 22:20:57 CEST