Re: [dev] [stali] Why lksh?

From: Cág <caoc_AT_riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:46:37 +0100

Bruno Vetter wrote:

> I'm curious why you have chosen lksh as the stali shell.

Nobody has. If I'm not mistaken, /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/mksh.
loksh[0]
is another shell that is mentioned on the site, but yet to be
distributed
with the rest of the source.

Cág

[0]: https://github.com/dimkr/loksh
Received on Sun Oct 09 2016 - 19:46:37 CEST