Re: [dev] [surf] Webkit2 with proxy server

From: Sylvain BERTRAND <>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:51:25 +0100

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:17:38PM +0000, Cág wrote:
> Staven wrote:
> >or do you know a better compromise than webkit?
> Yeah, write our own web engine with blackjack and hookers, which is
> mentioned on Project ideas page.

c++ software pulls also a c++ compiler and runtime in their dependencies, which
are horrendous compared to a C compiler/miminal runtime.

When you add up all of this, we are in no compromise but a total rip off and
take over of those critical software components by very few corporations.

Then I repeat myself, this is no compromise here, it's just being fuc*ed all
the way.

If I want to sabotage or take over a software component, I'll migrate it to c++
and push hard on a brain damaged object oriented design to scare away any
reasonably skilled coders. Moreover that design will be so fuc*ed up, it will
generate tons of bugs and security holes to justify a good salary for idiotic
bosses (or as corrupted as their coders).

The real pb are web coders: many of the web sites could have a noscript portal
without losing significant functionalities. The web sites which _must_ have a
rich GUI (hence a dynamic browser, for instance soundcloud) should provide an
simple web API (without that pile of cra* which is OAuth).

I'm about to sue some french administrations over their www sites and my french
bank www sites for their lack of interop with light www browsers.

Received on Sat Dec 17 2016 - 18:51:25 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Dec 17 2016 - 19:00:15 CET