On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:17:38PM +0000, Cág wrote:
> Staven wrote:
>
> >or do you know a better compromise than webkit?
>
> Yeah, write our own web engine with blackjack and hookers, which is
> mentioned on Project ideas page.
c++ software pulls also a c++ compiler and runtime in their dependencies, which
are horrendous compared to a C compiler/miminal runtime.
When you add up all of this, we are in no compromise but a total rip off and
take over of those critical software components by very few corporations.
Then I repeat myself, this is no compromise here, it's just being fuc*ed all
the way.
If I want to sabotage or take over a software component, I'll migrate it to c++
and push hard on a brain damaged object oriented design to scare away any
reasonably skilled coders. Moreover that design will be so fuc*ed up, it will
generate tons of bugs and security holes to justify a good salary for idiotic
bosses (or as corrupted as their coders).
The real pb are web coders: many of the web sites could have a noscript portal
without losing significant functionalities. The web sites which _must_ have a
rich GUI (hence a dynamic browser, for instance soundcloud) should provide an
simple web API (without that pile of cra* which is OAuth).
I'm about to sue some french administrations over their www sites and my french
bank www sites for their lack of interop with light www browsers.
--
Sylvain
Received on Sat Dec 17 2016 - 18:51:25 CET