On 16 June 2017 at 11:49, <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:53:07 +0000
>> sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Dear Sylvain,
>>
>> > openbsd is as shitty as linux and their security thingy is just
>> > bullshit.
>>
>> are you serious? LibreSSL is proof enough that OpenBSD's approach is
>> probably the sanest for a general solution.
>> Not to go too OT, but the one-system-approach we find with OpenBSD is
>> probably the best in the long term. I won't dare to imagine how many
>> man-years have been wasted to keep the different Linux distributions up
>> and running instead of concentrating the efforts into one solution.
>
> When people are using the word "openbsd", it does designate the kernel project.
> Not the userland projects.
>
> Regarding the libreSSL project, heard it's less worse than openSSL. Usually my
> network crypto enabled software uses gnutls, not *SSL code. gnutls uses
> "nettle" as its crypto engine. Wonder when libreSSL will split their crypto
> engine from their network engine: if it's already done, what the name of their
> crypto engine?
>
> --
> Sylvain
>
http://man.openbsd.org/crypto.3
Received on Fri Jun 16 2017 - 17:51:18 CEST