Re: [dev] Xorg implementations

From: Alba Pompeo <>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 18:20:20 -0300

Patching software to work with musl libc (and sending patches
upstream) improves overall software.
Not that much is needed. Most programs work out of the box with musl.

There was a talk about this a few months ago.

On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:57 PM, robin <> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:13:21AM +0000, wrote:
>> I did check alpine package web browsers: it's full of libgcc_s deps.
>> You can forget alpine as a no libgcc_s distro. At least, they do maintain the
>> patches required in order to compile many software packages with the musl
>> libc.
> Patching the shit out of everything...
> I don't like this. It seems like a hassle and it only treats symptoms
> while the cause is still poisoning the forest.
> I'd rather live in shit-world until a proper solution exist.
Received on Sat Jul 08 2017 - 23:20:20 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Jul 08 2017 - 23:24:31 CEST