Re: [dev] less(1) replacement?

From: Stéphane Aulery <>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:22:58 +0200

Le 28/08/2017 à 11:44, a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:41:42AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
>> Le 27/08/2017 à 19:29, a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
>>>> My idea is how to reconcile the implementation of programs and a kernel
>>>> that is a multiplexer like plan9 with a language and a sound compilation
>>>> environment like that of Oberon.
>>> Once you have a nice working kernel with a vulkan stack and GPUs drivers, we'll
>>> talk about it again. In the meantime, good luck and fair winds.
>>> But really, you should try ada and rust, they "solved" probably all what you
>>> are talking about, already.
>>> Even rust has a less worse syntax than go, as far as I can recall. Don't forget
>>> to have a look at ada, a very strongly backed language... oh! and I was told
>>> something about mathematical proof integration with the D language.
>>> You also have the ML family, the "beauty" of "functional" languages:
>>> formal proof software is usually written using them, and lucky you, one of them
>>> has object orientation straight in the syntax, ocaml. I expect the addition of
>>> "aspect programming" straight in the syntax too!
>>> A good start would be to write your own compiler (not optimizing first). I
>>> suggest a c++17 compiler could be a good warm up, what do you think of that?
>> That one feels the anger through irony. Thanks anyway.
> Irony, probably, but there is probably more, like a bit of truth and reality?
> It may be time to come down from the silver tower.

Then explains.

Stéphane Aulery
Received on Mon Aug 28 2017 - 19:22:58 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 28 2017 - 19:36:06 CEST