Re: [dev] [sxiv] doesn't want to be compiled

From: Greg Reagle <>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:45:58 -0400

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017, at 07:05, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> mk is nice, but there is just not enough "spread" of it to justify
> using it. Everyone with a toolchain has a POSIX compliant make utility.
> The problem with 9base/mk is that many people don't associate the two.

I don't understand what you mean that "many people don't associate the
two". Do you mean that many people do not know that 9base includes mk?

> Maybe it would be wiser to separate mk from the rest and offer it as a
> single package.

I am curious why. 9base already exists and is quite small and is
packaged for Debian and Arch for example. Do you want it packaged for
more distributions?
Received on Mon Oct 09 2017 - 06:45:58 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 09 2017 - 06:48:16 CEST