Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > musl is the only alternative, fairly feature complete, libc, that is still
> > being developed. uClibc/dietlibc haven't been around for many years
> https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/log/
Forgot about it. Anyway it doesn't see that much activity comparing to musl.
> yup... and next one is bearssl
> https://bearssl.org/
What is so great about it? I only know about Libre/OpenSSL and the GNU
implementation.
P.S. By Linux I meant kernel related solutions.
Cheers
--
caóc
Received on Tue Jan 16 2018 - 21:06:30 CET