Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Cág <
ca6c_AT_bitmessage.ch
>
Date
: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:31:50 -0600
Sean MacLennan wrote:
>> I'm thinking of something you can compile the Linux kernel[0] with.
> The Linux kernel only compiles with the GNU toolchain. There are
> efforts to get it compiling with clang but I believe they are not there
> yet.
Wrong. Not even you can compile it with Clang, (HOSTCC=clang CC=clang),
but link it with lld:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109288.html
> The Linux kernel is portability because the GNU toolchain is portable.
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/993/875/084.png
-- caóc
Received on
Tue Dec 25 2018 - 19:31:50 CET
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Sean MacLennan: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
Previous message
:
stephen Turner: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
In reply to
:
Sean MacLennan: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
Next in thread
:
Sean MacLennan: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
Reply
:
Sean MacLennan: "Re: [dev] Yet another "sane alternatives" thread"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Dec 25 2018 - 19:36:07 CET