On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM Daniel Cegiełka
<daniel.cegielka_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> An interesting solution is to keep JFS metadata on a fast separate
> ssd. Then on the main disk you have only data structures that can be
> recovered more easily.
I find it a terrible idea (for non enterprise deployments) to put the
journal on a separate disk. For one, most laptops (which are the
"workstations" of today) have only one disk; secondly it would split
the data from the journal which would make the movement of the disk
containing the data quite problematic (given that a desktop could have
more partitions with JFS than actual SSD drives).
Ciprian.
Received on Mon Apr 22 2019 - 07:35:06 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Apr 22 2019 - 07:48:08 CEST