Re: [dev] Why not use the -exec feature of find?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Cem Keylan <ml_AT_ckyln.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:54:15 +0300

"Greg Reagle" <list_AT_speedpost.net> writes:

> Why isn't that the common advice? Is the -exec feature of find fairly
> new, or fairly new to Posix?

Actually it's quite the opposite, "-exec" has been POSIX for a long
time, but neither "xargs -0" nor "-print0" are specified by POSIX.

--
Best Regards,
Cem Keylan

Received on Thu Jun 24 2021 - 18:54:15 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: qsmodo_AT_tutanota.com: "[dev] [dwm] Why should (or shouldn't) dwm have a spawn function?"
Previous message: Hadrien Lacour: "Re: [dev] Why not use the -exec feature of find?"
In reply to: Greg Reagle: "[dev] Why not use the -exec feature of find?"
Next in thread: Greg Minshall: "Re: [dev] Why not use the -exec feature of find?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jun 24 2021 - 19:00:08 CEST