Re: [dev] [DEV][Quark] Big problem

From: Thomas Oltmann <thomas.oltmann.hhg_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:02:48 +0100

Hi fossy,
Looks to me like your version of quark is actually a lot newer than 2020;
Old versions of quark did not print that "dropped" message.

Probably only tangentially related,
but I reported a bug in the connection dropping code some time ago,
which meant that quark would likely drop legitimate connections under load
(IP address comparison check was the wrong way 'round).
I don't think the fix ever got merged ...

On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 8:12 PM Страхиња Радић <contact_AT_strahinja.org> wrote:
>
> On 23/02/25 12:59PM, fossy_AT_dnmx.org wrote:
> > Tried -s 128 -t 8, doesn't seem to do jack shit..
> > Got less than 10 connection logs from Quark and then another dropped one..
> > Is there any other reason Quark would print-out 'dropped', other than
> > connection pool at max?
> >
> > I restarted the jail, so Quark's memory and stuff should have been reset.
>
> Reread Laslo's message and look at the source code as he suggested in the
> mentioned message.
Received on Sun Feb 26 2023 - 14:02:48 CET