[dev] C variants, compilers and completeness

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Sagar Acharya <sagaracharya_AT_tutanota.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:38:08 +0200 (CEST)

I see C compilers recommended by suckless are:

tinycc
simplecc
cproc
qbe
lacc

Which variant of C do they offer? What are the differences and do they offer sufficient features to express with a program completely?

Kindly comment some more on your explanation.
Thanking you
Sagar Acharya
https://humaaraartha.in
Received on Mon Jul 24 2023 - 17:38:08 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Yan Doroshenko: "Re: [dev] Announcing a couple small X11 utilities"
Previous message: Jan Klemkow: "Re: [dev] Suckless DNS server"
Next in thread: Pontus Stenetorp: "Re: [dev] C variants, compilers and completeness"
Reply: Pontus Stenetorp: "Re: [dev] C variants, compilers and completeness"
Reply: David Demelier: "Re: [dev] C variants, compilers and completeness"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jul 24 2023 - 17:48:09 CEST