Re: [dev] [sbase] Defining scope of sbase and ubase

From: Страхиња Радић <contact_AT_strahinja.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:51:11 +0100

On 24/03/08 06:40AM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> I would like to move the discussion here and see what alternatives
> we have and how to proceed in this case.

IMHO, if the intention behind sbase was to provide a minimal portable POSIX
utilities implementation, anything not fitting that definition should be moved
out of sbase.

A separate project, perhaps called [insert_letter]base, could cover the
utilities not in POSIX which are common in Unix-like systems.

The problem of having separate *box executables could be solved by creating an
"umbrella" *box project, perhaps having sbase, ubase and [insert_letter]base as
git submodules, and deciding what to build based on the contents of config.mk.
Received on Fri Mar 08 2024 - 20:51:11 CET