Re: [dwm] sel without clients?

From: Sander van Dijk <a.h.vandijk_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:21:09 +0200

On 8/11/06, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. That portion survived because of
> evolutionary reasons.

The same probably goes for the if(sel->prev) line (see attached
patch). When zoom gets to that point, it's already certain that sel !=
clients, and hence also that sel->prev != NULL.

Gr. Sander.

Received on Fri Aug 11 2006 - 09:21:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:30:05 UTC