Re: [dwm] dwm-1.1 large numbers of clients diff (includes xinerama)

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:40:38PM +0000, David Tweed wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:42:39PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > Lemme decide after dwm-1.2. I actually like your idea about
> > handling Xinerama, and I'd like to consider applying a lite
> > version of your Xinerama patch to the mainstream distribution
> > after dwm-1.2, though I'm not sure about the details yet. I'll
> > need to check this first in a multihead setup.
> | I'm not sure this will really happen at all in the near future,
> | because I work on single monitors usually.
>
> No problem, as this patch is what I actually use for my stuff it's no
> problem posting updated versions to the list for anyone
> interested as new dwm versions come out.
>
> Just to be clear: the one thing that it would be useful for my
> patches (and perhaps others' patches) to have in dwm would be a function like
>
> void
> processmodifiedtagging(void)
> {
> settitle(sel);
> if(!isvisible(sel))
> arrange(NULL);
> else
> drawstatus();
> }
>
> which can be called once something else has fiddled with the tags (and
> occurs at end of tag() and toggletag() in main distribution). If it's in the
> main distribution then any changes to drawing logic don't need to
> be detected and copied into any out-of-tree patches that modify tags but
> will be picked up automatically.

Ok, I applied something similiar:

http://10kloc.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/dwm?fd=2ec9cead84a7;file=tag.c

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361