Re: Re: [dwm] dwm-1.7.1

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_10kloc.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:17:51 +0200

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:16:29PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:12:54PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 03:52:26PM +0200, Tube wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:29:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > > > > http://www.shortest.de/download/dwm-1.7.1.tar.gz
> > > > I forgot to mention that wide layout patch for dwm-1.7 applies
> > > > to this release as well, though untested.
> > > hi anselm, won't you merge that patch into the source base?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > At least not like it is at the moment. I also realize that
> > sometimes the wide layout patch might be of use. But i have
> > something different in mind. I consider to allow moving the
> > stack around on the fly. This means:
> >
> > default (stack in the right):
> >
> > MMMMSS
> > MMMMSS
> > MMMMSS
> >
> > MMMMMM
> > MMMMMM
> > SSSSSS
>
> Maybe those both would suffice with stack direction in mind:
>
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > 111122223333
> > 111122223333
> > 111122223333
> >
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > 111111111111
> > 222222222222
> > 333333333333
> >
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
>
> The stack at left or top is somewhat redundant.

And there is a second advantage in reducing the stacking places
into wether right or bottom, because this would be simply a
toggle (same with the direction stuff).

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe  ><><  www.ebrag.de  ><><  GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 17:17:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:31:38 UTC