Re: Re: [dwm] dwm-1.7.1

On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 17:17 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:16:29PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:12:54PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > > At least not like it is at the moment. I also realize that
> > > sometimes the wide layout patch might be of use. But i have
> > > something different in mind. I consider to allow moving the
> > > stack around on the fly. This means:
> > >
> > > default (stack in the right):
> > >
> > > MMMMSS
> > > MMMMSS
> > > MMMMSS
> > >
> > > MMMMMM
> > > MMMMMM
> > > SSSSSS
> >
> > Maybe those both would suffice with stack direction in mind:
> >
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > 111122223333
> > > 111122223333
> > > 111122223333
> > >
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM
> > > 111111111111
> > > 222222222222
> > > 333333333333
> > >
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> > > MMMMMMMMMMMM 111222333444
> >
> > The stack at left or top is somewhat redundant.
>
> And there is a second advantage in reducing the stacking places
> into wether right or bottom, because this would be simply a
> toggle (same with the direction stuff).

I believe this would satisfy my needs! I'd keep it as simple as possible
-- no left or top. Also, make sure you can specify your default stack
location and direction in config.h.
-RPM
Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 18:38:29 UTC